We made a purchase offer for a house directly from the builder.
We set an approved final inspection as a condition for the sale.
The authority approved it.
Then it turned out the approval was illegal.
👑 The Emperor’s New Clothes
▼Officials admitted in court that they knew the legal requirements but decided to ignore them “discretionally” and through “common interpretation.” The law was replaced by an informal agreement between civil servants.
— Building Inspector Aro, under oath, District Court October 8, 2025
Like H.C. Andersen’s fairy tale: the truth is revealed, but the parade continues. No one stops the emperor.
View the story with documents →📋 Officials testified under oath in District Court
▼Four officials from Naantali were questioned as witnesses. The hearings revealed that they knew the legal requirements but decided to act “discretionally” against them.
— Building Inspector Ellilä, District Court October 8, 2025
Each hearing has been transcribed verbatim and legally analyzed. Names of third parties redacted.
Read witness testimonies (K88-K91) →Insurance Company Confirms: Structural Problem in Legal System
▼LähiTapiola’s legal protection insurance made a decision that reveals the jurisdictional ambiguity as real. A professional actor who assesses legal risk daily disagrees with the District Court’s interpretation.
This is no longer just one citizen’s claim – an independent third party confirms a system-level problem.
Read more about circular reasoning and insurance confirmation →Technical Evidence: Physics Doesn’t Know “Discretion”
▼Life-threatening and illegal installations. Fire hazard. “Illegal contractor.”
Installed above foundation. Water remains in structures. “Against good building practice.”
Execution seriously deviates from plans (e.g., ventilation unit on wrong floor). Stamped final drawings missing.
4 times worse than recommendations. Vapor barriers untaped and broken. “Moisture damage risk.”
Wood darkening. Ventilation missing. Non-compliant structure.
The authority approved the property in final inspection with the note: “No remarks.”
View expert technical reports and hearings →The Pattern Repeats
Building inspection. Parking enforcement. Different cases, same model. When structures are challenged, the system doesn’t correct itself – it protects itself.
See how →